4 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Delores
Delores
Board Member
2 years ago

I voted no for I saw the little “Easter egg” provided when Audra was introduced. She was given high praises in her work and expertise in getting corporations going public successfully processed. It was something about her that said she also had another agenda hidden from the obvious reasons she was there.

sueW
sueW
Heir Apparent
2 years ago

I voted Yes! because I hope that’s how the story goes. Not because I do or don’t like Victoria, or Devon, or whooooever, BUT – I want the story to catch fire and then lead to a spectacular Newman downfall… and then renewed Newman success… and then failure… and so on and so on. I miss the YnR days of cutthroat business stories, and I want this seeming revival to catch fire, explode, and continue shifting power among ruthless players. I like this type of drama so much better than convolulted, bordering on cheesy love stories (that nonetheless always suck… Read more »

Toni
Toni
Senior Executive
2 years ago

No. And Nate will tie his wagon and sell his shares to whoever wins the bid.

HENRY
HENRY
Board Member
2 years ago

I voted “NO” on Nate and Victoria’s take-over plans but I did so with much hesitation. Now that Tucker is back I think he is going to factor into that equation somehow. Also, I am not convinced that Audra Charles is on the level. Lastly, Elena could “spill the beans” at any time….This is an intriguing storyline.